• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

Çмú´ëȸ ÇÁ·Î½Ãµù

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > Çмú´ëȸ ÇÁ·Î½Ãµù > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Åë½ÅÇÐȸ Çмú´ëȸ > 2014³â Ãá°èÇмú´ëȸ

2014³â Ãá°èÇмú´ëȸ

Current Result Document : 5 / 5 ÀÌÀü°Ç ÀÌÀü°Ç

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) ºòµ¥ÀÌÅÍ ±â¼ú °æÀï·Â ºÐ¼®
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) An analysis on the technology competitiveness of BigData
ÀúÀÚ(Author) È«ÀçÇ¥   ±è¹æ·æ   Jae-pyo Hong   Pang-ryong Kim  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 18 NO. 01 PP. 0066 ~ 0067 (2014. 05)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ƯÇãºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ºòµ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ±â¼ú °æÀï·ÂÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ Æ¯Çã È°µ¿ÀÌ °¡Àå È°¹ßÇϸç, ÃÖ±Ù µé¾î ƯÇã Ãâ¿ø ¹× µî·Ï ƯÇã¼ö°¡ Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ Æ¯Çã È°µ¿Àº ¾çÀû Ãø¸é¿¡ Ä¡¿ìÃÄ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆǴܵǴµ¥, ¿Õ¼ºÇÑ Æ¯ÇãÈ°µ¿¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í Àο뵵 ¹× ¿µÇâ·ÂÁö¼ö´Â ¿ÀÈ÷·Á Ç϶ôÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ±â ¶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù. Çѱ¹Àº ÀϺ», Áß±¹, ij³ª´Ù µî°ú ´õºÒ¾î ºñ±³Àû È°¹ßÇÑ Æ¯ÇãÈ°µ¿À» Àü°³ ÁßÀ̳ª, ¹Ì±¹°ú ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î ¾çÀû Ãø¸é¿¡ Ä¡¿ìÃÄ ÀÖ¾î ÇâÈÄ ¾çÁúÀÇ ±â¼ú È®º¸¸¦ À§ÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀ» ±â¿ï¿©¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
This study is to compare and analyze the technology competitiveness of Big Data sector through patent analysis. According to results of the analysis, the United States is the most active country on the patent activities and its applied and registered patents have multiplied in recent times. However, both CPP(Cited Per Patent) and PII(Patent Impact Index) of the US would have declined, indicating that the growth of technology in the US seems to be biased to quantitative growth of technologies. Korea has been relatively active patent activities with Japan, China and Canada, whereas it has tended to be biased to quantitative growth with the US; Therefore, Korea government needs to concentrate efforts to retain the high quality technologies.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) BigData   patent analysis   technology competitiveness  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå