• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

±¹³» ³í¹®Áö

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > ±¹³» ³í¹®Áö > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö > Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö B

Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö B

Current Result Document :

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) ÆäÀÌÁö ·©Å©Áö¼ö¿Í ÁúÀÇ È®ÀåÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Àç·©Å· ¹æ¹ý
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) A Reranking Method Using Query Expansion and PageRank Check
ÀúÀÚ(Author) ±èÅÂȯ   Àüȣö   ÃÖÁ߹Π  Tae-Hwan Kim   Ho-Chul Jeon   Joong-Min Choi  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 18-B NO. 04 PP. 0231 ~ 0240 (2011. 08)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
»ç¶÷µéÀº ¿ùµå ¿ÍÀ̵å À¥ »ó¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëÀÚ°¡ ¿øÇÏ´Â Á¤º¸¸¦ °Ë»öÇÏ´Â ¿©·¯ ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòµéÀ» ±¸ÇöÇØ ¿Ô´Ù. ÀÌ·¸°Ô ±¸ÇöµÈ °Ë»ö ¾Ë°í¸®Áò Áß °¡Àå ÁÁÀº ±â¼úÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â °÷Àº ÆäÀÌÁö·©Å©(PageRank)¹æ½ÄÀÇ ±¸±ÛÀÌ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ ¿ÜºÎ¿¡¼­ ÂüÁ¶ÇÏ´Â ¸µÅ©°¡ ¸¹Àº ¹®¼­¸¦ °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â ¹®¼­ Áï, ´ëÁßµéÀÌ °ü½ÉÀ» °¡Áö´Â ¹®¼­¸¦ »óÀ§¿¡ º¸¿©ÁÖ´Â ÆäÀÌÁö·©Å© ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Ð »ç¿ëÀÚ°¡ ¿øÇÏ´Â ¹®¼­¸¦ ã¾Æ¼­ Á¦°øÇÏÁö ¸øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. °³Àο¡°Ô °¡Ä¡°¡ ÀÖ´Â ¹®¼­¸¦ ã±âº¸´Ù ´ëÁß¿¡°Ô °¡Ä¡°¡ ÀÖ´Â ¹®¼­¸¦ ã±â ¶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ¾îÈÖÀÇ Àǹ̸¦ Á¤È®È÷ Ç¥ÇöÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ¿öµå³ÝÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »ç¿ëÀÚ ÁúÀÇ ÀÌ·Â Á¤º¸¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ÇöÀç ÁúÀǸ¦ È®ÀåÇÑ °³ÀÎÀû °¡Ä¡¿Í ÆäÀÌÁö ·©Å©Áö¼ö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ´ëÁßÀû °¡Ä¡¸¦ ¸ðµÎ °í·ÁÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÑ´Ù. ½ÇÇè°á°ú Á¦¾ÈÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀº »óÀ§ 30°³ÀÇ °Ë»ö°á°ú Áß Æò±Õ ¾à 60% °á°úµé¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¸¸Á·ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ±¸±Û °Ë»ö °á°ú¿¡ ºñÇØ Æò±Õ ¾à 14% Çâ»óµÈ ¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
Many search algorithms have been implemented by many researchers on the world wide web. One of the best algorithms is Google using PageRank technology. PageRank approach computes the number of inlink of each documents then ranks documents in the order of inlink members. But it is difficult to find the results that user needs, because this method find documents not valueable for a person but valueable for the public. To solve this problem, We use the WordNet for analysis of the user's query history. This paper proposes a personalized search engine using the user's query history and PageRank Check. We compared the performance of the proposed approaches with google search results in the top 30. As a result, the average of the r-precision for the proposed approaches is about 60% and it is better as about 14%.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) ¿öµå³Ý   °³ÀÎÈ­   Á¤º¸ °Ë»ö   ÆäÀÌÁö ·©Å©   WordNet   Personalized   Information Retrieval   PageRank  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå