• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

±¹³» ³í¹®Áö

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > ±¹³» ³í¹®Áö > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Åë½ÅÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö (Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering)

Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Åë½ÅÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö (Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering)

Current Result Document : 94 / 246 ÀÌÀü°Ç ÀÌÀü°Ç   ´ÙÀ½°Ç ´ÙÀ½°Ç

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) ISO 18185 ±â¹ÝÀÇ ÄÁÅ×ÀÌ³Ê ¾ÈÀü¼ö¼Û ½Ã½ºÅÛ ±¸Çö
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) Implementing Secure Container Transportation Systems Based on ISO 18185 Specification
ÀúÀÚ(Author) Ãß¿µ¿­   ÃÖ¼ö¿µ   Young-yeol Choo   Su-Young Choi  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 14 NO. 04 PP. 1032 ~ 1040 (2010. 04)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
ÀÌ ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ISO 18185 Ç¥ÁØ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÀÇ ÀüÀÚºÀÀΰú Ãâ¹ßÁöºÎÅÍ ¸ñÀûÁö¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÒ ¶§±îÁö È­¹°ÀÇ º¸¾È »óŸ¦ °¨½ÃÇÏ´Â ÄÁÅ×ÀÌ³Ê ¾ÈÀü¼ö¼Û °¨½Ã ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ±¸Çö °á°ú¸¦ ±â¼úÇÑ´Ù. ÀüÀÚºÀÀΠǥÁØÀÇ °æ¿ì ±â¹Ð¼º(confidentiality)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ç¾çÀÌ Á¤ÀǵǾî ÀÖÁö ¾Ê¾Æ µµÃ»°ú °°Àº º¸¾È°ø°Ý¿¡ Ãë¾àÇÏ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ RC5¿Í AES-128 Ç¥ÁØ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¾Ïȣȭ/º¹È£È­ ±â´ÉÀ» ±¸ÇöÇÏ°í ±× ¼º´ÉÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè°á°ú´Â ¾Ï․º¹È£È­ ½Ã°£ Áö¿¬¿¡¼­ RC5°¡ ¿ì¼öÇÔÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¾Æ¿ï·¯ µ¥ÀÌÅÍÀÇ ±æÀÌ°¡ Áõ°¡ ÇÒ¼ö·Ï, ³·Àº CPU ¼º´É¿¡¼­´Â ´õ¿í À¯¸®ÇÏ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Tag¿Í ¸®´õ »çÀÌÀÇ Åë½Å½Ã°£À» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ÀÀ´ä½Ã°£¿¡¼­´Â ¾Ïȣȭ 󸮽ð£ÀÌ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â ºñÁßÀÌ 1% ¹Ì¸¸À¸·Î RC5¿Í AES-128 »çÀÌ¿¡ ÀǹÌÀÖ´Â ¼º´É Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾î µÎ »ç¾ç ¸ðµÎ »ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÔÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
This paper describes implementation of electonic seal (E-Seal) of a container based on ISO 18185 standard and development of monitoring systems checking E-Seal device and cargo states in the container for secure transportation from departure to destination. For lack of definition on confidentiality support in ISO 18185-4 standard, it is vulnerable to security attack such as sniffing. To cope with this, we developed encryption/decryption functions implementing RC5 and AES-128 standards and compared their performance. Experimental results showed that RC5 outperformed AES-128 in terms of time delay. In addition, RC5 had an advantage under the condition of large sized messages as well as CPUs with low performance. However, the portion of encryption/decryption processing time was less than 1 percent of response time including communication delay between E-Seal tags and readers. Hence, the performance difference between RC5 and AES-128 standards was trivial, which revealed that both specifications were allowable in developed systems.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) ISO 18185   E-Seal   RFID   RC5   AES-128   ISO 18185   ÀüÀÚºÀÀÎÀåÄ¡   ¹«¼±ÀνÄÀåÄ¡   RC5   AES-128  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå