• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

±¹³» ³í¹®Áö

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > ±¹³» ³í¹®Áö > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸°úÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö > Á¤º¸°úÇÐȸ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦ ³í¹®Áö (KIISE Transactions on Computing Practices)

Á¤º¸°úÇÐȸ ÄÄÇ»ÆÃÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦ ³í¹®Áö (KIISE Transactions on Computing Practices)

Current Result Document : 1 / 2   ´ÙÀ½°Ç ´ÙÀ½°Ç

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) ¹«±âü°è ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾îÀÇ Ç°Áú Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÂüÁ¶ ¸ðµ¨ ¹× Ç°Áú ÃøÁ¤ µµ±¸ °³¹ß
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) Development of Reference Model and Quality Measurement Tool for Quality Evaluation of Weapon System Software
ÀúÀÚ(Author) ÃÖÇöÀç   ÀÌ¿µ¿ì   ÀÌÁÖÇö   ¹éÁö¼±   ±èµ¿È¯   Á¶±ÔÅ   äÈï¼®   Hyun Jae Choi   Young Woo Lee   Joo Hyun Lee   Ji Sun Baek   Dong Hwan Kim   Kyu Tae Cho   Heung Seok Chae  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 25 NO. 03 PP. 0179 ~ 0190 (2019. 03)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
±âÁ¸ ¹«±âü°è ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î Ç°Áú Æò°¡´Â ¹æÀ§»ç¾÷ûÀÇ °³¹ß´Ü°èº° »êÃâ¹° Á¡°ËÇ¥¸¦ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ÇÑ µ¿·á°ËÅ並 ÅëÇØ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. »êÃâ¹° Á¡°ËÇ¥´Â ±â¼ú¹®¼­ÀÇ °¢ Àå/Àý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³»¿ë À¯¹« È®ÀÎ ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¼ºµÇ¾î ¸ðµ¨¸µ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ÏÀü¼º, ÀÏ°ü¼º, ÃßÀû¼º°ú °°Àº Ç°Áú Æò°¡°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ °³¹ßÀÚ º°·Î ¸ðµ¨¸µ ÀÛ¼º ¼öÁØÀÌ »óÀÌÇÑ ±â¼ú¹®¼­°¡ ÀÛ¼ºµÇ¾ú°í, µ¿·á°ËÅä¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Æò°¡´Â ÁÖ°üÀûÀ̾ ÀÏ°ü¼º ÀÖ´Â Ç°Áú ÃøÁ¤ ¹× ¼öÄ¡È­°¡ ¾î·Á¿ü´Ù. ±×¸®°í »êÃâ¹°µé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ËÅä°¡ ÀÚµ¿È­µÇÁö ¸øÇØ ½Ã°£°ú ³ë·ÂÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ ¼Ò¸ðµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹«±âü°è ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ±â¼ú¹®¼­ Ç°Áú Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ±â¼ú¹®¼­ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼ÒµéÀ» Ç¥ÇöÇÏ´Â ¹«±âü°è ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ÂüÁ¶ ¸ðµ¨ ±¸¼º ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ°í Á¤·®ÀûÀÎ Ç°Áú Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇØ Ç°Áú ÃøÁ¤ ¸ÞÆ®¸¯ ÃøÁ¤ ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÚµ¿È­µÈ Ç°Áú Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ Ç°Áú ÃøÁ¤ µµ±¸ °³¹ß ¹æ¾ÈÀ» ¼Ò°³ÇÑ´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
The evaluation of the quality of existing weapon system software was done by the Defense Acquisition Program Administration using a peer review based on the product checklist for each development phase. Since the product checklist is written at the level of checking the presence of contents in each chapter/section of the technical document, there was no quality evaluation such as completeness, consistency, and traceability of the modeling data. As a result, a technical document with different levels of modeling was written for each developer, and the evaluation by peer review was subjective, making it difficult to measure or quantify the consistency quality. It took a lot of time and effort as the review of the output was not automated. In order to improve the quality evaluation method of weapon system software technical documents, we propose the construction of a weapon system software reference model that expresses the items of technical document and the measuring quality metrics for quantitative evaluation. It also introduces the development measure of a quality measurement tool for quality evaluation automation.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) Ç°Áú ÃøÁ¤ µµ±¸   ¹«±âü°è ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ÂüÁ¶ ¸ðµ¨   Ç°Áú ÃøÁ¤ ¸ÞÆ®¸¯   ¹«±âü°è ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î Ç°Áú Æò°¡   quality measurement tool   weapon system software reference model   quality measurement metric   weapon system software quality evaluation  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå