• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

±¹³» ³í¹®Áö

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > ±¹³» ³í¹®Áö > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸°úÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö > Á¤º¸°úÇÐȸ³í¹®Áö (Journal of KIISE)

Á¤º¸°úÇÐȸ³í¹®Áö (Journal of KIISE)

Current Result Document : 3 / 7 ÀÌÀü°Ç ÀÌÀü°Ç   ´ÙÀ½°Ç ´ÙÀ½°Ç

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) È¿°úÀûÀÎ º¯ÀÌ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÑ C ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯ÀÌ µµ±¸ ºñ±³: Proteum°ú Milu¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ »ç·Ê ¿¬±¸
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) A Comparative Study of C Program Mutation Tools for Effective Mutation Analysis: A Case Study of Proteum and Milu
ÀúÀÚ(Author) ±èÀ±È£   ±èÇö¿ì   ¾ç¿õ±Ô   ±è¹®ÁÖ   Yunho Kim   Hyunwoo Kim   Woong-gyu Yang   Moonzoo Kim  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 45 NO. 04 PP. 0342 ~ 0347 (2018. 04)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
º¯ÀÌ ºÐ¼®Àº ºÐ¼® ´ë»ó ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ Äڵ带 º¯ÇüÇÑ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯À̸¦ ½ÇÇàÇØ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ ½ÇÇà °á°ú º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â ±â¹ýÀÌ´Ù. ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯ÀÌ ºÐ¼®ÀÌ È¿°úÀûÀ̱â À§Çؼ± ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯ÀÌ µµ±¸°¡ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯À̸¦ »ý¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î »ý¼ºµÈ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯ÀÌ°¡ ºÐ¼® ´ë»ó ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°ú Àǹ̰¡ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ µ¿µî º¯À̰ųª ´Ù¸¥ º¯ÀÌ¿Í Àǹ̰¡ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ Áߺ¹ º¯ÀÌÀÎ °æ¿ì º¯ÀÌ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ½ÇÇà °á°ú º¯È­¸¦ º¼ ¼ö ¾ø±â ¶§¹®¿¡ º¯ÀÌ ºÐ¼®¿¡ È¿°úÀûÀÌÁö ¾Ê´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â C ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ È¿°úÀûÀÎ º¯À̺м®À» À§ÇØ º¯ÀÌ µµ±¸ Proteum°ú Milu¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¾ó¸¶³ª È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯À̸¦ »ý¼ºÇÏ´ÂÁö ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯À̸¦ »ý¼ºÇϱâ À§ÇØ º¯ÀÌµÈ Ç¥Çö½ÄÀÇ Á¤±ÔÇüÀ» °è»êÇÏ°í Á¤±ÔÇüÀÌ °°Àº º¯À̸¦ Áߺ¹ º¯ÀÌ·Î Á¦°ÅÇÏ¿´´Ù. SIR º¥Ä¡¸¶Å©ÀÇ 4°³ Linux/Unix À¯Æ¿¸®Æ¼ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Àû¿ëÇÑ °á°ú Proteum°ú Milu°¡ »ý¼ºÇÑ º¯ÀÌ Áß °¢°¢ Æò±Õ 48.7%, 46.4%°¡ À¯¿ëÇÑ º¯ÀÌ¿´´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
Mutation analysis generates mutants of a target program by applying syntactic changes to the source code and analyzes the difference of execution results of the mutants from those of the original program. For effective mutation analysis, mutant generation tools should be able to generate effective program mutants. For example, a mutant that is semantically equivalent to the original program or another mutant is not an effective mutant, because it does not generate an execution result different from that of the original program or another existing mutant. This paper presents a comparative study of two mutant generation tools for C programs, Proteum and Milu. To generate effective mutants effectively, we generated a canonical form of mutated expressions and removed duplicated mutants that have the same canonical form as that of other mutants. We applied Proteum and Milu to four Linux/Unix utilities in the SIR benchmark and showed that 48.7% and 46.4% of mutants generated by Proteum and Milu were effective mutants on average, respectively.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) º¯ÀÌ ºÐ¼®   ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯Çü   º¯ÀÌ Å×½ºÆ®   C ÇÁ·Î±×·¥   ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î Å×½ºÆà  mutation analysis   program mutation   mutation testing   C program   software testing  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå