• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

±¹³» ³í¹®Áö

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > ±¹³» ³í¹®Áö > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Åë½ÅÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö (Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering)

Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Åë½ÅÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö (Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering)

Current Result Document :

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) ÀϹÝÈ­µÈ ÆǺ°ºÐ¼® ±â¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ´Éµ¿¼Ò³ª Ç¥Àû ½Äº°
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) Sonar Target Classification using Generalized Discriminant Analysis
ÀúÀÚ(Author) ±èµ¿¿í   ±èÅÂȯ   ¼®Á¾¿ø   ¹è°Ç¼º   Dong-wook Kim   Tae-hwan Kim   Jong-won Seok   Keun-sung Bae  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 22 NO. 01 PP. 0125 ~ 0130 (2018. 01)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
¼±ÇüÆǺ°ºÐ¼®(LDA) ±â¹ýÀº Ư¡º¤ÅÍÀÇ Â÷¿øÀ» ÁÙÀ̰ųª Ŭ·¡½º ½Äº°¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â Åë°èÀû ºÐ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¼±Çü ºÐ¸®°¡ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ÁýÇÕÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ºñ¼±Çü ÇÔ¼ö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ư¡º¤Å͸¦ °íÂ÷¿øÀÇ °ø°£À¸·Î »ç»ó(mapping) ½ÃÄÑÁÜÀ¸·Î½á ¼±Çü ºÐ¸®°¡ °¡´ÉÇϵµ·Ï ¸¸µé ¼ö Àִµ¥, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¹ýÀ» ÀϹÝÈ­µÈ ÆǺ°ºÐ¼®(GDA) ¶Ç´Â Ä¿³ÎÆǺ°ºÐ¼®(KDA) ±â¹ýÀ̶ó°í ÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÀÎÅͳݿ¡ °ø°³µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â ´Éµ¿¼Ò³ª Ç¥Àû½ÅÈ£¿¡ LDA ¹× GDA ±â¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ç¥Àû½Äº° ½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ°í, ±× °á°ú¸¦ ºñ±³/ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè °á°ú 104°³ÀÇ Å×½ºÆ® µ¥ÀÌÅÍ¿¡ ´ëÇØ LDA ±â¹ýÀ¸·Î´Â 73.08% ÀνķüÀ» ¾ò¾úÀ¸³ª GDA ±â¹ýÀ¸·Î´Â 95.19%·Î ±âÁ¸ÀÇ MLP ¶Ç´Â Ä¿³Î ±â¹Ý SVM¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ªÀº ¼º´ÉÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
Linear discriminant analysis is a statistical analysis method that is generally used for dimensionality reduction of the feature vectors or for class classification. However, in the case of a data set that cannot be linearly separated, it is possible to make a linear separation by mapping a feature vector into a higher dimensional space using a nonlinear function. This method is called generalized discriminant analysis or kernel discriminant analysis. In this paper, we carried out target classification experiments with active sonar target signals available on the Internet using both liner discriminant and generalized discriminant analysis methods. Experimental results are analyzed and compared with discussions. For 104 test data, LDA method has shown correct recognition rate of 73.08%, however, GDA method achieved 95.19% that is also better than the conventional MLP or kernel-based SVM.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) ¼Ò³ªÇ¥Àû ½Äº°   ¼±ÇüÆǺ°ºÐ¼®   Ä¿³ÎÆǺ°ºÐ¼®   Sonar target classification   linear discriminant analysis   kernel discriminant analysis  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå