• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

¿µ¹® ³í¹®Áö

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > ¿µ¹® ³í¹®Áö > JIPS (Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ)

JIPS (Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ)

Current Result Document :

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) Analysis of Academic Evaluation Indicators Based on Citation Quality
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) Analysis of Academic Evaluation Indicators Based on Citation Quality
ÀúÀÚ(Author) Mingyue Zhang   Jin Shi   Jin Wang   Chang Liu  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 14 NO. 04 PP. 0916 ~ 0925 (2018. 08)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
The academic research performance is often quantitatively measured by means of using citation frequency. The citation frequency-based indicators, such as h-index and impact factor, are commonly used reflecting the citation quality to some extent. However, these frequency-based indicators are usually carried out based on the assumption that all citations are equal. This may lead to biased evaluations in that, the attributes of the citing objects and cited objects are significant. A high-accuracy evaluation method is needed. In this paper, we review various citation quality-based evaluation indicators, and categorize them considering the algorithms being applied. We discuss the pros and cons of these indicators, and compare them from four dimensions. The outcomes will be useful for our further research on distinguishing citation quality.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) Academic Evaluation Indicators   Citation Analysis   Citation Impact   Citation Quality  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå