• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

Çмú´ëȸ ÇÁ·Î½Ãµù

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > Çмú´ëȸ ÇÁ·Î½Ãµù > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸°úÇÐȸ Çмú´ëȸ > 2020³â ÄÄÇ»ÅÍÁ¾ÇÕÇмú´ëȸ

2020³â ÄÄÇ»ÅÍÁ¾ÇÕÇмú´ëȸ

Current Result Document : 12 / 12

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) ÀÌ¿ô±â¹Ý Çù¾÷ÇÊÅ͸µ¿¡¼­ »çÀü ÇÊÅ͸µ ±â¹ýµéÀÇ Á¤È®¼º ºñ±³
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) Comparison of Accuracy among the Pre-filtering Methods for Neighbor Selection in Collaborative Filtering
ÀúÀÚ(Author) Sao-I Kuan   ±èÁ¾¹Î   ¼ÛÇÏÁÖ   Jongmin Kim   Ha-Joo Song  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 47 NO. 01 PP. 0862 ~ 0864 (2020. 07)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
Collaborative Filtering calculation costs most of the time in calculating with sparse data and similarity of neighbors. Choosing the suitable neighborhood set can save time and increase the accuracy, since correlation between the target user and the neighbors could affect quality directly for the recommendation system. We compared the result by using 4 different pre-filtering approaches to choose a similar neighbor set for collaborative filtering: Threshold filtering, Top-N filtering, Percentage filtering, and Negative-Percentage filtering.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå