2016³â ÄÄÇ»ÅÍÁ¾ÇÕÇмú´ëȸ
Current Result Document : 2 / 2
ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) |
¾î¼Àºí¸® ±â¹Ý »ðÀÔ°á½Ç º¯ÀÌ Å½Áö ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î µµ±¸ÀÇ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼® |
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) |
Comparative Analysis of Assembly- - based Insertion and Deletion Calling Tools |
ÀúÀÚ(Author) |
·ù´ÜÈÖ
ÀÌÈ«¶õ
Ȳ±Ô¹é
Duanhui Liu
Honglan Li
Kyu-Baek Hwang
|
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) |
VOL 43 NO. 01 PP. 0830 ~ 0832 (2016. 06) |
Çѱ۳»¿ë (Korean Abstract) |
|
¿µ¹®³»¿ë (English Abstract) |
Insertions and deletions (INDELs) ¡ª one of the most common forms of structural genomic variants ¡ª are known to have direct or indirect impact on various human genetic diseases. INDEL calling is a challenging problem, partly due to sequencing and alignment errors as well as repetitive elements in human genome. Thus, a substantial amount of false positives and false negatives are believed to exist in results from current variant calling tools. In this paper, we compare three state-of-the-art assembly-based variant calling methods, assessing their sensitivity and precision using a gold standard data set. Our comparison results are helpful to researchers in choosing an appropriate workflow for INDEL calling.
|
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) |
insertions
deletions
INDELs
INDEL calling
assembly
|
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ |
PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå
|